Wednesday, February 21, 2007

When Muslims become a part of a European Govt - is this a good sign?

read here

The new ministers are members of the lefty party - the one which imported all those masses of Muslim immigrants over the years. You be the judge - is this Eurabia coming into fulfillment or just a good sign of how well the relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims is?

The real test would soon arrive as there is no doubt those two will voice their public opinion regarding Jihadists and their victims soon. My bet is on CAIR-type comments though.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Are Edward's comments a signal to the Democrats shift against Israel?

Recent reports tell a tale of a democratic presidential candidate claiming Israel is the biggest threat to world's peace. It has long been predicted that the democrats will betray their Jewish voters and turn against Israel - is this it? Hope not.

A small note - the Israeli news YnetNews website has been acting as a lobbyist for Edwards, publishing several articles about him and almost none about any other candidate from any party. I don't think they'll take the hint and condemn him.

What happens when you bribe a snake to be your friend?

The recent meeting between Condi, Olmert and Abbas received small attention in the western media. To recap on what had happened in the last month:
1. A civil war broke between rival terrorists within the Palestinian Authority
2. The US and Israel provided weapons and "support funds" (bribery in plainer terms) to Abbas's terrorists to combat the "bad terrorists".
3. The Arab world, horrified by the idea that its depraved culture of glorifying murder could turn on itself BEFORE it eliminates Israel, decided to pay a larger bribe to Abbas's terrorists (Fatah) and sign the Mecca deal.

The Mecca deal, for those who did not bother to follow, is not a "unity government" as some portray but a surrender agreement. Abbas agrees to serve as a representative for Hamas's newer government while everybody pretends that it is not Hamas who are in control. Meanwhile, and regardless whether or not the US, Israel, and EU fund the PA, the Saudis will contribute some of their petro-dollars to pay the salaries of the PA terrorists.. err.. civil workers. There are more details, including military support, but it all means the same thing: Fatah and Abbas will switch "owners" and agree to be paid by Saudis instead of westerners, while Hamas is allowed to take over. The money will cushion the blow and the heads of the rival tribes (Mafia families) will be paid to keep the calm.

Abbas took the western money, pretended to defend his turf in the mafia world of the PA, provided empty promises of future peace agreement, keeping civil order etc, and turned around to give it all to Hamas.

Now he met with Olmert and Condi to tell them in plain Arabic (he won't stoop to show his knowledge of English and Hebrew): "Up Yours! Accept or else."

Surprised? It sure seemed that Olmert and Condi where. Shocked - to say the least. Giving new arms to terrorists apparently is not such a great idea. What happens when you bribe a snake? Will he not eventually turn to bite you? One does not rise to the point of "honor" among thieves and murderers without actually being one.

Monday, February 12, 2007

Great post on why Jews should fear the Left

Read here.

From the article (closer the the end):
Toward the middle of last month, in an online posting at Arianna Huffington’s website, retired general and former Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark was asked why he thought America would attack Iran.

Clark replied: “You just have to read what’s in the Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers.”

Why the Israeli press, and not the Wall Street Journal, Rush Limbaugh, or Fox News? And, in case you haven’t guessed it, “the New York money people” isn’t code for Episcopalians.

I just got an itch I cannot scratch... I do remember Wesley Clark bragging having some family ties to Jews during his campaign on the last race. I always thought it was silly back then, 7 nominees pretending to be "Jewish" only to court some Jews within the democratic party.

Friday, February 02, 2007

Jacques Chirac, Nukes and the next Holocaust

I don't know what's more insulting, the fact that the antisemitic French president chose to tell reporters that in his mind he dreams of how the Iranians already achieved nukes, its quite OK, and will soon eliminate that pesky little country of Jews. But they should be careful because they might get hurt in the process. Or that he "kinda" retracted the day after saying it was really off the record... and what he really thinks is that diplomacy will bring peace in our time... bla-bla-bla.

He is not the only one to express publicly his glee towards the upcoming second Holocaust. Airheads from the left here in the US are shameless in the same way. Some congressmen from the left appear on fox news saying that a nuke in the hands of the Iranians is no-biggy. Same goes for airhead "peace activist" actors who maintain the stance that since "we provided India or someone with energy for mango - the Iranians should have nuke power". They stopped short of completing the sentence by saying "and incinerating those rat Jews - Boo Ha Ha Ha Ha".

In the face of the left's acceptance and shameless promotion of the next Holocaust - Jews who vote for the left, and who participate in their "peace" activities - should seriously consider why it is they aligned them selves with the useful idiots of the new Nazis.