The Persian World War

In the late 70-s the radical president Jimmy Carter pushed Iran over the edge and has brought a colossal disaster only second to the rise of the Nazis. It is now a recorded page of history that the US along with the Europeans pushed the Shah of Iran to give concessions to the radicals in his country in the name of “democratization”. When the political structure collapsed it gave rise to the fourth Reich… err... erase that, to the Islamic republic of Iran. The new Iran vowed to fight until the elimination of Israel and to fight until the end of times to eliminate the USA with the intent of replacing it with a state within the Shea super world power – Iran. What I have just written should come as news to nobody. The question I am asking is – do people realize that Iran is in war with Israel and the United States?

The Iranian strategies for each front:
Iraq: Very simple, ignite every possible local feud, arm whoever wishes to undermine stability, blame the US for everything. As Iran sees it, the US’s involvement in Iraq weakens the economy, the resolve and the recruitment levels. The longer the United States stays involved with the blood thirsty Arabs of Iraq, the more Iran gains. The goal is to disallow American foothold close by to Iranian borders for a possible strike too close to Teheran. For this reason, they will turn on their own Shea agents; they will harbor Al-Qaeda leaders and will fund whoever wishes to hold a gun and murder in Bagdad. Iran sees the war with the United States a long term mission and the current battle as nothing more than a prelude.

Israel: The way I see it, Iran has devised the following strategy to fight Israel along with their Palestinian cronies and Lebanon’s Hezbollah:

1. Ignite and persist terror attacks against Israel in decided areas over time to encourage Israel to contemplate “unilateral withdrawals” or “interim peace treaties”.
2. Provide a few months of calm or low intensity fighting to reassure western and Israeli public opinion.
3. Quietly and methodically construct a military deterrent in evacuated territories.
4. Resume violence in new strategic locations.

This strategy will repeat itself until, as they hope, enough territory is available for construction of an assault force which would try to take what is left of Israel in a swift move.

Lebanon:
1. Periodically assassin key opposing politicians to keep the “non Shea” majority submissive to Shea demands.
2. Maintain a tense truce with Israel to assist propaganda within Shea youths
3. Flood Lebanon with fake dollars to buy influence, undermine any attempt to create a viable economy and undermine any western influence
4. Terrorize and threaten Christians to encourage their departure from the Middle East
Once the Shea will feel confident enough, they will claim they are the majority (even if they are not) and proclaim the country theirs, imposing Iranian style theocracy rule. The Shea are not timid when it comes to broiling a new civil war.

Syria:
Taking advantage of the weak mafia rule of Assad the second, Iran has virtually taken control over Syria foreign policy. There could be sincere doubts regarding the current state of sovereignty of Syria. The “Allowies” cult who are a minority within Syria yet they are the rulers of the country, although considering themselves to be related to “Shea”, are considered by most other Muslims as pagan. I can only guess what Iran’s intentions towards Syria are; my best guess is that their plans are postponed until they can establish their plans for Iraq and Lebanon.

South America:
Iranian efforts include several parallel routes. Firstly, Iran is basing its terror power on voluntary immigration from Lebanon and exiled Iranians. Iran has used some of its cells in the 90-s to attack Jewish targets in Argentina. There are concentrated areas of disorder which Hezbollah has used as money laundering and training centers. The lack of civil order and widespread corruption present in Latin America is fertile ground for international espionage. These are not “James Bond 007” style romantic adventures, these are seriously dangerous developments.

The second major route includes establishing strong diplomatic ties with whoever stands out as the bigger opposition to the United States. Currently – Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela. When Chavez met Ahmedinajad the headlines should have screamed: “The convention of the devilish megalomaniacs.”

United States:
One cannot tell when and how the overt operations of Iran will begin within the United States. One can only guess that not all members of the Persian Diaspora are loyal citizens. One can only guess that Dearborn, MI, is a model for infiltration with mal intents. These assertions cannot be validated by facts. The only truth to the matter is that the Shea population within the US has received less attention since it is the Sunni that the agencies battle with the war on Al-Qaeda. I can assume however that for any violent measure taken by the US against Iran’s sovereign entity, there are operational plans for terror attacks within the US. It is a known fact that several Iranian agents have been caught while taking surveillance for potential such attacks.

It is unclear to me how one can ignore all other fronts, which are clearly fronts in a war against the United States, if not US’s interests. Taken the state of affair, it seems to me that the US is in a state of war with Iran, not so much a cold one either.

Nukes? Anyone?
Much hoopla lately regarding the nuclear ambitions of Iran. Nothing being done to stop it though. My best optimistic approach would say Iran would only use its nukes for self defense to deter any exterior intervention which might try to undermine the dark regime. The general opinion however is much more pessimistic and assumes that Iran would not hesitate to use their nuclear weapons as soon as possible in their global war efforts

Rolling disastrous policies in the Middle East

Both republicans and democrats, when they discuss policies for stability in Iraq in particular, and in the Middle East in general, miss the main point. They base their plans on the delusion that the tribal structure of the Arab world along with the blood thirsty culture can be some how molded into a form of a democratic self government. It seems to me that every attempt to give the Arabs in Iraq self governing and policing control results in rivers of blood. Every location the Army cleared of terrorists and then handed over, turned in a short while to a new safe haven for the same or “newly recruited” terrorists from the older or a newly formed terror group. Is this a global network or the manifestation of a culture we are looking at?

The same genius approach is implemented in Lebanon and in Gaza. The Israelis turn a blind eye to the Syrian and Iranian ongoing process of militarizing the local populations. They are turning the civilian population to a division of the Syrian armed forces with the directives and command of Syrian and Iranian military officers. For a quick reminder, Israel withdrew from south Lebanon and Gaza on the behest of the world community with the encouragement of the US. The idea was to let self governing Arabs reach the conclusion that peace is at hand and live happily ever after. Living in la la land won’t solve a thing. Not for Iraq, not for Gaza and not for Lebanon. It is high time someone reaches that conclusion and begins diverting efforts from a “democratic Arab rule” to an imposed dictatorship and complete occupation on these people. Some nations are too blood thirsty to rule themselves.

Collecting news bits... Lebanon is on the brink of civil war

* Today, a major Christian leader was assassinated. This follows threats from Hezbollah demanding to take over the country. Can't say what will happen next; In the past we can find instances where Christian would go on a rampage - taking vengeance against any Muslim they encounter. In the past we've seen masses go to the streets with protest. In the past we've seen world indifference for horrors in Lebanon, we've seen world complaisance with Syrian oppression of the Lebanese, we've seen mass exodus of Christians - without anyone crying for their plight.

* In other news, whenever we hear of Abu Mazen escaping the PA to some Arab state I'm suspicious. He always does so to avoid being on the ground when the PA war to eliminate Israel escalates. He would like us to believe he has nothing to do with it. Now he is on his way to Saudi Arabia. The land of camel milk and money.

* The Israeli government is engaged in large scale incursions into Gaza city for the purpose of killing one or two terrorists. They claim that they are doing everything possible to stop the bombing of the Israeli town of Sderot. Everything? Really? How about admitting giving land for terror...err, land for "peace" was a mistake? How about taking back control? Everything? I doubt it. If 99% of the world already finds it acceptable to condemn fighting terror without mentioning terror at the UN assembly, if France is already the enemy on your border, if spineless Spain who ran with their tails from Iraq and capitulated to terrorists to change their government in the last election, if Spain wishes to put troops on the ground in Gaza... (too scared to fight Muslims, but fighting Jews is a habit straight from the era of the inquisition) ... Then Why Oh Why not do whatever is right and let the hypocrites whistle their empty tunes. Safeguard your own before appeasing your "faux ami".

Two more foreigners were kidnapped in Gaza. The bleeding hearts just can't get it through their thick scull. Infidels to Gaza Muslims is like Meat to Carnivores.

Le Islamic Republic Du France

A salam aleikum infidels. Bon jour. Como Sava? Sava Bien? Convert or we will kill you and have a nice day.

While buses are torched by Jihadists, cops are ambushed and lynched. While the demographics shows France is surrendering to Islam. While school girls are gang raped for the crime of being white. While the Jews flee. While the Jewish schools are torched. While every Monday and Thursday a new plot to bomb "La Metro" is uncovered. While the French courts are abused to enforce silence regarding the lies of the "al dura" blood libel. All the while... The French foreign office finds the time to zealously condemn Israel, The French troops pride themselves on protecting the terror group Hezbollah by targeting Israeli reconnaissance planes.

I pity the last remaining breed of white Frenchmen. The self destructing - suicidal - soon to be minority in their own country - French.

Dare we call it a wave of Anti Semitism?

An excellent collection of horrifying series of events at frontpage-magazine

Just add this to swastikas at Californian universities and the recent election of a Nation of Islam congressman who converted in Detroit (where else?). The evil will spread from Detroit until it will consume the country.

Does the 2006 Pelosi victory signal a coming disengagement from Israel?

Consider the facts: She represents the anti-Semite lefties of San Francisco. Her taking over the congress house is in sync with a first ever Nation Of Islam congressman (Minnesota).

Today, another tragedy happened in Gaza, I presume the following hours will show us who the democrats really are by expressing their opinions on the subject. In my opinion, what happened in Gaza today is another highly suspicious incident where it is possible that the Palestinians are to blame for the deaths as much as it is possible that the usual suspect (- Israel) is. I expect the Democrats to put aside their latest victory to focus on what they really care about - those poor Jihadists/Palestinians.

Update
I was wrong - no peep from the democrats regarding the deaths in Gaza. Either that, or none reported. There's enough mess caused by their other loony ideas such as reimposing the draft.

Very - Very Intresting article

Daniel Pipes once again gives strong insightful and well researched historical anecdote extremely relevant to our time:

Read here

Profiling... again... or not?

Does the fact that most people who are arrested with suspicion of contemplating terror acts are Muslims mean that law enforcement agencies are profiling Muslims, or is it that almost exclusively all terror plots are contemplated by Muslims?

The true face of Anti-Semitism

When people reflect on the meaning of antisemitism they often think about WWII and mumble calmly that “those Germans, it was their fault entirely” - Disregarding the fact that it was a world plague.

Antisemitism should not be measured only with backwards goggles. You cannot reflect back, state that things were probably bad because of a few select “bad people” and that today it is all different. In my view, the harshest forms of antisemitism come to light when blatant hatred of Jews is disregarded as the norm. This is a clear sign of things going really bad.

The hatred has gone no where. The symptoms might have subsided for a few years, even allowing the Jewish people to form their own state, but recent horrifying actions which have gone with little attention from media have reassured us that antisemitism is back full throttle.

Take the US universities as a classic example. Hate is taught and practice under the false pretense of Middle Eastern studies or “sensitivities to the feelings of Muslims”. Swastikas on Jewish dorms have apparently become a thing of the norm, not worthy of reaching the news. “It is all the Jews fault, they started all the wars” – when a famous (religious?) entertainer said that the media went into a frenzy but when it is repeated by too many in the left spectrum of our political arena it is considered “OK”.

It is back, full throttle, and the worst part about it is the calmness by which humanity accepts it. It is normal to hate and harass the Jews – this is the true face of antisemitism – this is its worst manifestation. One day some will look back, reflect and write in history books that “there might have been some indications of Jew hating but they were scarce as they were not too often highlighted by media”. Everyone thought the holocaust was a surprise, didn’t expect that for some reason – what next disaster will humanity ponder about with slight indifference?

I dont believe debka.com but...

If what they write is true - that is - that Israel knows where stock piles of missile on route to Hezbollah are laying in Syria, then combine that fact with the entrance to the government of the clinically insane Avigdor Lieberman (not to be confused with a democrat) - add the two and you get that stock pile bombed in the next two weeks, sparking the next middle east war.

Conversations on the road

I rarely wish to engage in conversations with random people I meet regarding the things I write about here. The main reason for that is that people usually fall into one of two categories. The first are willfully ignorant of the situation. Their naïve questions and world views can easily amount to an insult. Never the less, once asked a naïve question I cannot help but provide a lengthy answer. The second group is the harshly opinionated. People, who do get updates, are aware of at least one side of the story but refuse to listen to anything which might burst their bubble. Arguing rapidly seems futile. Somehow I do get dragged into such conversations with strangers.

Two examples of such discussions which have happened in the last two months; on the first occasion, I met a stranger in an airport. He was an elderly stranger who sat next to me at the airport burger king. For some odd reason he began talking to me (uninvited). He started telling me how he used to work in the pentagon, how he knows and met Israeli leaders, how familiar he is with the Bush family etc. None of this I wished to know. He brought up this information to let me know what he thought about the Lebanon war. How he thought that Israel was in real trouble and how they lost the war (I excuse you from the expletives he used). He went on to tell me how stupid he thinks G.W Bush is. How he admires Rabin, and what an extremist Benjamin Netanyahu.

Between him chewing his whopper with his mouth open, to his age, to his zeal, I chose not to argue. I smiled, responded with a few generic observations without going into details and as soon as I could – shook his hand and said good bye. In case you’re wondering he was in the second group – harshly opinionated.

Another conversation happened to me recently with a cab driver on my way to a different airport. He said he deliberately avoids listening to the news and gets updates about once in two months. He asked me if all people really live in a war zone in Israel. I think for the next 10 minutes, while sitting in a traffic Jam, I gave my best effort to describe what is happening, has happened and why. Most importantly I stressed out that from my knowledge, most Israelis live their life as if there is and was no war. As if they are not surrounded by millions striving to murder them. People live in apartments, go to work, send their kids to school and are usually just going through a normal life.

I did not go into details but did mention that life gets destroyed by random acts of terror, by imposed states of war, or how the latest war devastated the north.

I do not know if my conversations with people changed the way they view things. I assume the 5 to 10 minutes they spent with me, a stranger, made little difference on them.

France - the new army of Allah!?

Ooh I hate to be right on such disastruas developments. I said before that the French intrest in Lebanon dubios - it turns out to be much worse. They have protected Hizbollah leader Friday during a shamefull boasting of power by a terror group. The French and Israeli plane were almost in a state of war fare.

I WARNED AGAINST THIS! Who is the idiot who called upon world powers to defend terror groups and fight against Israel?! The current stage can be one of two things:

1. Either this is a sure visible precursor to World War III (Guess which side the French are on?)

2. The situation in Lebanon will somehow miraculasly pacify... Germany, France and Russia will not be dragged into a direct military conflict with Israel (in the name of Iranian oil)

Icky - Yacky situation....

Spoken Pope

They’re angry and violent again… for being told that being angry and violent is evil. The Muslims think it is within their rights to tell believers and leaders of other religions what to do and say. All the while they take constant and deliberate offense from being criticized. Catholics on the other hand are known to stand firm behind the leader of their religion and not bow to intimidations.

This is exactly the same situation as was with the Danish cartoons. The Islamists were looking for an excuse to prove to all non Muslims that Islam followers do behave violently.

A small note: When the Vatican expressed condemnations to terror acts it listed out exactly which instances it meant while deliberately ignoring violent acts against Jews in Israel. When the state of Israel protested the response was even harsher, the Vatican responded by saying: “neither you nor no one else has a right to tell the holly Pope what he should and should not say”. This incident caused great stress in the relations between Catholics and Jews, and between the Vatican and the state of Israel.

Perhaps all the hypocrites who say “the Pope should have said this”, “should have done that”, “should not have said”, “should have apologized more censure”, they should consider the catholic stance on the divinity of the Pope and respect the fact that for Catholics, the Pope is always right and others who might criticize are considered hostile and irrelevant.

Observing the two religions one fails to see resemblance. The Catholics who take offense from criticism of their Pope do not go to the streets to burn and murder. The Pope was criticized for speaking while the Muslims are criticized for doing true evil: Murdering in the name of god.

Keeping face by an anti-semite phony rights group

Amnesty international has published a report on their opinion that Hezbollah did commit war crimes. For some reason it took them longer to reach such conclusion than to conclude immediately, spontaneously and incorrectly that Israel has committed war crimes.

A very good piece on the subject of their bias was written by Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz. Read here.

The mere fact is that this is not the first time they do this; they cling to every bogus claim of victim hood by Taquiyya committing Jihadists. They are quick to accuse Jews and Israel of horrific crimes, then after years of such behavior, and after dozens of one sided reports they wash their hands by a single short and very quietly published paper admitting that what Arabs are doing to Jews is without a doubt a war crime. Only after 9/11 did we see them go after the US with similar impertinence while trying to tag every measure taken to defend Americans as violations of human rights. Violation of the rights of the terrorists.

They are Anti-Semite by their actions. Their bias and zeal to indict Jews first cannot be interpreted by anything but Anti-Semitism however much they will deny it.